Are war hawks using Hillary Clinton to divide and conquer the Democratic Party?

Neoconservatives, who had considerable influence on Former Republican President George W. Bush's foreign policy and were behind the costly wars in Iraq and Afghansitan, are now trying to influence Hillary Clinton, who is considering running for the Democratic presidential nomination:

After nearly a decade in the political wilderness, the neoconservative movement is back, using the turmoil in Iraq and Ukraine to claim that it is President Obama, not the movement’s interventionist foreign policy that dominated early George W. Bush-era Washington, that bears responsibility for the current round of global crises.

Even as they castigate Mr. Obama, the neocons may be preparing a more brazen feat: aligning themselves with Hillary Rodham Clinton and her nascent presidential campaign, in a bid to return to the driver’s seat of American foreign policy.

[...] 

It’s not as outlandish as it may sound. Consider the historian Robert Kagan, the author of a recent, roundly praised article in The New Republic that amounted to a neo-neocon manifesto. He has not only avoided the vitriolic tone that has afflicted some of his intellectual brethren but also co-founded an influential bipartisan advisory group during Mrs. Clinton’s time at the State Department.

It's not just the brains of the neocon movement that are praising Hillary Clinton. Republican U.S. Senator John McCain of Arizona, who is one of the biggest war hawks in either house of Congress, praised Hillary Clinton a while back and is open to the idea of supporting Hillary's possible candidacy for president.

Many of the same war hawks who helped people like George W. Bush, Dick Cheney, and Donald Rumsfeld lead this country into two long, costly wars that resulted in the deaths of thousands of Americans and turned a federal budget surplus into a massive federal budget deficit are now promoting Hillary Clinton's possible presidential candidacy as part of an apparent plan to divide and conquer the Democratic Party, whose base is full of progressives who, like me, are opposed to the interventionist foreign policy that the neocons support and promote. I disagree with people like Hillary Clinton and John McCain on this, but I firmly believe that the U.S. shouldn't be the world's policeman and should stay out of the affairs of foreign countries except when U.S. interests are at stake.

Hillary Clinton is more interested in serving some of George W. Bush's former cronies than rebuilding the American middle class and other progressive goals.

Establishment Democrats are no longer interested in fighting for anything

Hillary Clinton, one of several possible candidates for the Democratic presidential nomination, has sounded guarded in recent media appearances. For example, she isn't willing to take a firm stand on a number of issues, such as the Keystone XL pipeline and legalization of recreational marijuana.

This is a considerably different Hillary Clinton today than the one we all saw in the 1990's. Back then, Hillary publicly spoke out in favor of universal health care and railed against the "vast right-wing conspiracy" against establishment Democrats, such as herself, and progressives.

Since Hillary Clinton is considered by many to be the standard-bearer of the establishment wing of the Democratic Party, that leads me to ask this question: Has the Democratic establishment stopped fighting for anything?

One of my biggest grievances about the current leadership of the Democratic Party is that the current leadership of the party is more concerned about getting themselves and their cronies elected than fighting for anything that would make America a better place to live. Granted, on a few issues, such as marriage equality and, more recently, student loan reform, most establishment Democrats are fighting alongside progressives. However, on many other issues, most establishment Democrats are either siding with the far-right Republicans or distancing themselves from the issue altogether.

The Democratic establishment has completely given up on the idea of political courage these days. Instead of fighting for ideas that will make America a better place to live, the Democratic establishment is more concerned about sucking up to special interests and rewarding their cronies. It's time for progressives to divide and conquer the Democratic Party and lead the party into a new, more progressive generation of leadership and courage. It's time for progressives to start fighting for pro-middle class, pro-worker, pro-woman, pro-civil rights, pro-civil liberties, and pro-democracy values, and start realizing that both the Republicans and the Democratic establishment are adversaries in this fight for America's heart and soul.