Sunday, June 15, 2014

The ACLU joins the Republican Party's War on Democracy


The ACLU is opposing a proposed amendment to the U.S. Constitution that would repeal the Citizens United v. FEC U.S. Supreme Court decision and other court decisions that have opened the floodgates to unlimited amounts of money in electoral politics in this country. What is even worse is that the ACLU is using the same argument against amending the U.S. Constitution to get the undue influence of money out of politics that Republicans and conservatives have used to open the floodgates to big-money politics in the first place:
In a letter submitted Tuesday to the Senate Judiciary Committee, the American Civil Liberties Union expressed opposition to the amendment, saying it would “lead directly to government censorship of political speech and result in a host of unintended consequences that would undermine the goals the amendment has been introduced to advance.”
The ACLU argued the amendment, intended to reign in the spending allowed by those rulings, would “fundamentally break the constitution and endanger civil rights and civil liberties for generations.”
The proposed constitutional amendment to get the undue influence of money out of politics would do absolutely nothing to restrict the free speech rights of Americans. What it would do is make it more difficult for wealthy people to buy elections and bring government closer to the people.

The ACLU is defending millionaires and billionaires who hate democracy, are waging a war on democracy in this country, and want to buy elections for themselves and their cronies. I strongly encourage members of the U.S. Senate to vote for the proposed amendment to eliminate the undue influence of money in politics in this country.

Could Brian Schweitzer run for President or Vice President as a Republican?

Former Democratic Montana Governor Brian Schweitzer recently attended Mitt Romney's Republican retreat in Park City, Utah, which is unexpected for someone who is considering running for the Democratic presidential nomination.

Here's my speculation as to why Schweitzer attended the Romney retreat: He may be considering running for president or vice president...as a Republican.

For those of you who are not familiar with Schweitzer, he's no fan of the Democratic establishment, having been a vocal critic of Democrats like Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton. While I'm certainly not a fan of the Democratic establishment myself, I'm considerably more progressive than Schweitzer is. Sure, he's taken stances to the left of mainstream Democrats on some issues, such as health care and campaign finance reform. However, he's also taken stances to the right of mainstream Democrats on issues like guns and the environment. Schweitzer was personally endorsed by NRA head Wayne LaPierre in his 2008 re-election bid for Governor of Montana, and Schweitzer has criticized President Obama and other Democrats for supporting clean air and clean water laws.

It's not completely out of the question that Brian Schweitzer may run for president or vice president as a Republican. If he did that, he would lose all of the respect I have for him, to put it mildly.